Service Features
  • 275 words per page
  • Font: 12 point Courier New
  • Double line spacing
  • Free unlimited paper revisions
  • Free bibliography
  • Any citation style
  • No delivery charges
  • SMS alert on paper done
  • No plagiarism
  • Direct paper download
  • Original and creative work
  • Researched any subject
  • 24/7 customer support

Discuss the basis and confidence with which an economist might conclude that living standards in Taiwan were three times those in Malaysia.

Title: Discuss the basis and confidence with which an economist might conclude that living standards in Taiwan were three times those in Malaysia.
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 427 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
Discuss the basis and confidence with which an economist might conclude that living standards in Taiwan were three times those in Malaysia.
In 1992 the GDP per head of Malaysia was $2200 and that of Taiwan was $6600. Discuss the basis and confidence with which an economist might conclude that living standards in Taiwan were three times those in Malaysia. -Different subsidy levels -Exchange rate differences -Subsistence economies -Non-monetary transactions -Poor bureaucracy An economist could not confidently conclude that living standards in Taiwan were three times those in Malaysia for a number of reasons: Different subsidy levels in the different …showed first 75 words of 427 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 427 total…it. If the Malaysian economy is largely dependant on trade, ie the exchange of rice for wheat, then the GDP will not represent the total value of all the transactions that have taken place in the economy. There are numerous reasons why an economist could not confidently conclude that living standards in Taiwan were three times those in Malaysia. The GDP figure is not a equitable representation of the standard of living within an economy.

Need a custom written paper?